Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (845 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] update yesterday no boot any longer
- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 15:49:35 +0200
- Message-id: <20080522134935.GA5425@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:36:36AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
It allows using "NX" bit (if the processor supports it), for hardware
level page execute protection.
Ciao, Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2008/05/22 14:09 (GMT+0200) Stephan Kulow apparently typed:
Am Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2008 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2008/05/22 15:29 (GMT+1000) Basil Chupin apparently typed:
I don't know why
suddenly 11B3 decided that I need the "-pae" kernel rather than the
usual "-default" as in past SuSEs/openSUSEs.)
Basil, I don't know why either, but I did 3 11.0b3 installs in recent days,
and all of them got the pae instead, even though all were 32 bit installs
and had 1G or less of installed RAM. At least I was able to boot those pae
Yeah, we're thinking about renaming kernel-default to
kernel-usually-works-on-most-hardware and kernel-pae to
kernel-the-one-you-really-want to avoid this confusion in the future.
I don't get it. Why is kernel-the-one-you-really-want wanted on systems with
1G or less of installed RAM? What besides ability to address non-existent RAM
4G is different about pae kernels?
It allows using "NX" bit (if the processor supports it), for hardware
level page execute protection.
Ciao, Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |