Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (904 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Desktop Selection
  • From: Lukas Ocilka <lukas.ocilka@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:05:49 +0200
  • Message-id: <480E532D.9060504@xxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Felix-Nicolai Müller napsal(a):
| Benji Weber schrieb:
| | On 22/04/2008, Felix-Nicolai Müller <fnmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| |> Yes, so alphabetical order has to be restored. Otherwise we should
just
| |> put KDE3 on top as it appears to be the most used DE among openSUSE
| users.
| |
| | I would vote for reverse-alphabetical order. No-one can argue that is
| | any less impartial than alphabetical order ¬_¬.
| |
| | --
| | Benjamin Weber
|
| Sure :-). Why don't we just randomize the output? At least we don't have
| to argue about the order if we do that.

... which means we are again in the same discussion as before.

And no, randomizing the order makes the dialog unreadable and generates
even more bugreports ...

What we need is to:
~ * Have nice and simple dialog understandable by less-experienced users
~ as well as all the openSUSE geeks.
~ * Provide helpful hints for less-experienced users to ease their
~ decision-making.
~ * Stay politically correct by not pre-selecting any option.
~ * Make it possible to select also another options (Xfce, Text Mode,
~ Minimal Installation).
~ ... ?

All I can see in this thread (and many others) is that there are so many
different ideas and opinions that it's almost impossible to fulfill all
the requirements.

Bye
Lukas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDlMtVSqMdRCqTiwRAn6TAJ9M9Xory2o0ePoBM5G4enTkYn4gQwCggrZj
jaRrcTWSo5vsPJU/sqCr67E=
=k9ru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >