Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Experience of switching to Factory from Ubuntu
- From: Will Stephenson <wstephenson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:53:35 +0100
- Message-id: <200802280853.35959.wstephenson@xxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 21:37:24 Vincent Untz wrote:
If PolicyKit does solve the desktop-privileged actions case in the medium
term, we should stick with root for consistency with previous openSUSE
releases and SLES (I don't see that changing to sudo) until then.
I think the policy is very relaxed - just 'packagers should update their
packages in a timely manner' which leads to inconsistent update frequency
across different parts of the distro as packagers have different priorities
which product to concentrate on. In the KDE team we cultivate a reputation
of having the latest KDE packages before other distros.
Will
--
Will Stephenson
Desktop Engineer
KDE Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
sudo should be used by default for a desktop install. It doesn't make
any sense to have the root account. There's an option "Use the same
password for root as the one used for the user" in the installer, but
it's not about sudo, I believe.
Thanks for pointing this out. I was myself a sudo supporter, but someone
with more technical experience than me explained to me that sudo is not
the right way to follow for various security/conceptual reasons, and I
agree. In the end, UNIX has root, and the users should learn to manage
it. It doesn't add complexity if properly explained.
I disagree with the fact that people should have to learn about root. It
makes things more complex for an average desktop user. I know sudo is
not perfect (and PolicyKit will help solve the whole issue in a good
way), but it's good enough in the very short term for desktop users.
If PolicyKit does solve the desktop-privileged actions case in the medium
term, we should stick with root for consistency with previous openSUSE
releases and SLES (I don't see that changing to sudo) until then.
with only a very short look, I saw many
not-updated-to-the-latest-versions packages: yelp, totem, epiphany,
rhythmbox for example.
This is SUSE policy. The released version is not upgraded until the next
release. I usually agree with it, because it's thought to grant
stability, but I think it was used in the wrong way sometime, not
providing updates when features were lacking (for 10.3, read: anjuta,
gedit with python support, ...).
The policy you're talking about is about the stable openSUSE. Using
factory, I have a more than one-year old yelp, for example.
Ubuntu is quite good at uploading new packages as soon as upstream
releases (at least, for GNOME). This is really great for a developer
like me.
I agree. But I don't want to think to continuous updates to the released
version ;-)
I think the policy is very relaxed - just 'packagers should update their
packages in a timely manner' which leads to inconsistent update frequency
across different parts of the distro as packagers have different priorities
which product to concentrate on. In the KDE team we cultivate a reputation
of having the latest KDE packages before other distros.
Will
--
Will Stephenson
Desktop Engineer
KDE Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |