Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Experience of switching to Factory from Ubuntu
- From: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:31:54 +0100
- Message-id: <200802272131.55091.dmueller@xxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
openSUSE/KDE would definitely not object to a simplified application menu
hierarchy. It is something that should be improved - but wisely.
I think you're confusing things: packages in factory should be updated, and
they should be updated early and often to catch regressions. usually you'll
find the updated packages in the buildservice first though before they end up
in factory, so that the biggest issues are already ironed out. I think thats
a good compromise.
use deltarpms. I think it is actually a bug that we don't produce them for
factory distribution - I don't know why actually.
a henn/egg problem: if nobody uses factory, nobody fixes factory.. somewhen I
do want to launch the "use factory" campaign.
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
the menu bar is completely unusable in openSUSE: icons are too big
(distro patch), and there are tons of submenus (because we use the same
menu config as KDE?)
openSUSE/KDE would definitely not object to a simplified application menu
hierarchy. It is something that should be improved - but wisely.
not-updated-to-the-latest-versions packages: yelp, totem, epiphany,This is SUSE policy. The released version is not upgraded until the next
rhythmbox for example.
release. I usually agree with it, because it's thought to grant
stability, but I think it was used in the wrong way sometime, not
providing updates when features were lacking (for 10.3, read: anjuta,
gedit with python support, ...).
I think you're confusing things: packages in factory should be updated, and
they should be updated early and often to catch regressions. usually you'll
find the updated packages in the buildservice first though before they end up
in factory, so that the biggest issues are already ironed out. I think thats
a good compromise.
when I update openSUSE with "zypper dup", I have to download nearly 1GB
of packages. I seriously doubt that all of them were updated. It takes
me hours to get all updates... (slow DSL line)
use deltarpms. I think it is actually a bug that we don't produce them for
factory distribution - I don't know why actually.
the Ubuntu development version is nearly never broken. Factory isAnother historical issue. I always read/experienced these issues.
always broken in some way (still usable, but either no network, or
uninstallable updates, or impossible to mount a usb key, etc.).
a henn/egg problem: if nobody uses factory, nobody fixes factory.. somewhen I
do want to launch the "use factory" campaign.
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |