Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] 11.0 default filesystems again
- From: Sid Boyce <sboyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:59:18 +0000
- Message-id: <47C33A36.4070400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Petr Cerny wrote:
I shall give that a try next time I do a new build, see how it squares off against ext3. I regard resilience ahead of performance as that's the one that can bite most painfully, but there is no reason not to have both.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Per Jessen wrote:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
There are better filesystems out there (ok, each is better then others
in one benchmark ;)
Disregarding benchmarks, what is generally considered a better
filesystem when the requirements are 1) terabyte size 2) 365x24 uptime,
3) LVM use and 4) millions of small files ?
I would go for XFS - but again, this is a matter of religion... ;)
Best regards
Petr
I shall give that a try next time I do a new build, see how it squares off against ext3. I regard resilience ahead of performance as that's the one that can bite most painfully, but there is no reason not to have both.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |