Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] 11.0 default filesystems again
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:33:57 +0100
- Message-id: <87ablrhk56.fsf@xxxxxxx>
Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Having some support and deprecated is both correct - and the current
state. JFS is AFAIK not maintained actively anymore and we do not
include it in any openSUSE internal tests or will consider any bug in
JFS support critical. There are better filesystems out there (ok, each
is better then others in one benchmark ;)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, aj@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Lukas Ocilka wrote:
I hoped that the FAQ could have helped:[faq cut]
That's also why JFS is not our default file system.
I have absolutely no issue with that - I'm not really too interested in
what openSUSE has as the _default_ filesystem - that is a question for
openSUSE product management. My primary concern is for openSUSE to
maintain (semi-)support of JFS.
The key issue in this thread is what Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
"there is a reason why JFS is deprecated with current versions of SLES."
I would like Gerald to elaborate on that, especially since current
versions of openSUSE have JFS support.
Having some support and deprecated is both correct - and the current
state. JFS is AFAIK not maintained actively anymore and we do not
include it in any openSUSE internal tests or will consider any bug in
JFS support critical. There are better filesystems out there (ok, each
is better then others in one benchmark ;)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, aj@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |