Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (331 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] beagle
- From: Christian Jäger <christian.jaeger@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:12:45 +0100
- Message-id: <1200607965.30042.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The problem is that this whole Beagle-debate that we had in the early
days quickly turned into a question of belief. Some swear Beagle is the
root of all evi... ah, slowness, some don't see what the fuss is all
about.
And we have/had the 'initial indexing' problem where people deinstall
Beagle directly after installation which of course gives them a
speed-up. But they (so is my opinion) would have experienced the same if
they'd just waited it out.
So, agreeing with Rajko M., unless a credible source provides benchmarks
that show a _considerable_ performance-drawback caused by Beagle, I
think there is no objective reason to dump it from the default
installation.
Greets,
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
days quickly turned into a question of belief. Some swear Beagle is the
root of all evi... ah, slowness, some don't see what the fuss is all
about.
And we have/had the 'initial indexing' problem where people deinstall
Beagle directly after installation which of course gives them a
speed-up. But they (so is my opinion) would have experienced the same if
they'd just waited it out.
So, agreeing with Rajko M., unless a credible source provides benchmarks
that show a _considerable_ performance-drawback caused by Beagle, I
think there is no objective reason to dump it from the default
installation.
Greets,
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |