Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (420 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] suggested work around for zypper/libzypp
- From: Igor Jagec <igorm5@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:43:07 +0200
- Message-id: <1191541387.5220.18.camel@munja>
On Čet, 2007-10-04 at 14:52 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2007-10-04 14:27:20 +0200, Igor Jagec wrote:
> > Me too. I must say I didn't figure what's the purpose of that approach.
> > For instance, Yum also downloads all the packages first, then updates
> > them. Since I'm still officially a Fedora user (I'll switch to openSUSE
> > 10.3 over the weekend), I'm quite familiar with Yum. And the funny thing
> > is that Fedora developers also don't like SmartPM very much.
> than i just hope you dont run it on x86_64.
Nope :)
To be honest, I've never liked Yum very much because it is very slow.
Speaking about performance, Zypper is much faster than Yum.
> in regards of biarch support zypper/yast still beats smart and yum.
That's very nice to know, thanks!
--
Igor Jagec
> On 2007-10-04 14:27:20 +0200, Igor Jagec wrote:
> > Me too. I must say I didn't figure what's the purpose of that approach.
> > For instance, Yum also downloads all the packages first, then updates
> > them. Since I'm still officially a Fedora user (I'll switch to openSUSE
> > 10.3 over the weekend), I'm quite familiar with Yum. And the funny thing
> > is that Fedora developers also don't like SmartPM very much.
> than i just hope you dont run it on x86_64.
Nope :)
To be honest, I've never liked Yum very much because it is very slow.
Speaking about performance, Zypper is much faster than Yum.
> in regards of biarch support zypper/yast still beats smart and yum.
That's very nice to know, thanks!
--
Igor Jagec
| < Previous | Next > |