Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (824 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] classpath-webplugin
- From: Andreas Vetter <vetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709181040070.16324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Andreas Vetter:
> >
> > I reopened
> > [Bug 264228] nspluginwrapper + java plugin problems
> > [Bug 288750] Home bank issues with java+firefox on x86_64
> > to get a final decision. I know it's really late, but a 64bit system
> > without a working firefox/java combination is a blocker in my eyes.
> And I disagree. If we don't make it obvious that Sun's "x86_64 is for servers
> only, no-one needs firefox there" is wrong, there is no chance either Sun
> changes that or the open source java catches up. You're free to put your money
> behind either side, but we took side - on the OSS side of life (with a
> hopefully easy way for our users to go with a NON-OSS alternative if present
> on that architecture).
Hmm, I agree that Sun is the culprit, but I think it will fall back to
openSUSE. At least we need a simple to follow guide how to get a working
firefox with java (including a complaint to Sun).
> Easing the update path in adding conflicts is very fine with me though. This
> should be reported though.
--
Andreas Vetter
Fakultaet fuer Physik und Astronomie
Universitaet Wuerzburg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Andreas Vetter:
> >
> > I reopened
> > [Bug 264228] nspluginwrapper + java plugin problems
> > [Bug 288750] Home bank issues with java+firefox on x86_64
> > to get a final decision. I know it's really late, but a 64bit system
> > without a working firefox/java combination is a blocker in my eyes.
> And I disagree. If we don't make it obvious that Sun's "x86_64 is for servers
> only, no-one needs firefox there" is wrong, there is no chance either Sun
> changes that or the open source java catches up. You're free to put your money
> behind either side, but we took side - on the OSS side of life (with a
> hopefully easy way for our users to go with a NON-OSS alternative if present
> on that architecture).
Hmm, I agree that Sun is the culprit, but I think it will fall back to
openSUSE. At least we need a simple to follow guide how to get a working
firefox with java (including a complaint to Sun).
> Easing the update path in adding conflicts is very fine with me though. This
> should be reported though.
--
Andreas Vetter
Fakultaet fuer Physik und Astronomie
Universitaet Wuerzburg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |