Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (824 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: commit mozilla-nss
- From: Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:41:57 +0200
- Message-id: <46EA8FA5.1030002@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
jacob berkman wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So where is the bug number in that changelog entry? We are after beta3
>> so I'd expect a bugnumber here.
>
> There is no bug number because nobody has used the functionality that
> this supports. The second someone would try to use it there would be
> one! There are plenty of relevant fate #s, such as 301351 and then a
> really vague one or two. I could certainly open a new bug.
>
>> What's the reason to merge the tools subpackage to the base package?
>
> The packages that perform system-wide certificate authentication
> (pam_pkcs11, krb5-preauth-plugin-pkinit or something) use a
> system-wide nss database for configuration of pkcs11 packages. The
> postinst scripts for pkcs11 packages should probably add themselves to
> this system db, but someone needs to create this database in the first
> place. It may as well be the nss package itself.
That might be all true and actually a thing like that was planned when I
still was there. I don't argue against the fact that the -tools package
is needed anyway in these cases.
> So, that means that the tools package is always needed;
No, it isn't. mozilla-nss (the libs) are used by the mozilla
applications (and a few others) which don't need the tools. So it's not
_always_ needed to have a working NSS environment. It's _always_ needed
if "(pam_pkcs11, krb5-preauth-plugin-pkinit or something)" is used.
That's the difference.
> I asked on one
> of the opensuse lists (-gnome?) last week about this, but I guess
> you're not on that?
No, I'm not. I don't have anything to do with Gnome but I have much to
do with mozilla and NSS isn't Gnome related at all.
> Anyway I don't really care either way what the
> package layout is; we just need to make sure that both the libs and
> tools are both installed by anyone who needs nss.
OK, that's a valid point but the solution IMHO is not to add the tools
to the library package but having correct dependencies or patterns
reflecting the requirement.
Thanks for your feedback,
Wolfgang
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 9/14/07, Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So where is the bug number in that changelog entry? We are after beta3
>> so I'd expect a bugnumber here.
>
> There is no bug number because nobody has used the functionality that
> this supports. The second someone would try to use it there would be
> one! There are plenty of relevant fate #s, such as 301351 and then a
> really vague one or two. I could certainly open a new bug.
>
>> What's the reason to merge the tools subpackage to the base package?
>
> The packages that perform system-wide certificate authentication
> (pam_pkcs11, krb5-preauth-plugin-pkinit or something) use a
> system-wide nss database for configuration of pkcs11 packages. The
> postinst scripts for pkcs11 packages should probably add themselves to
> this system db, but someone needs to create this database in the first
> place. It may as well be the nss package itself.
That might be all true and actually a thing like that was planned when I
still was there. I don't argue against the fact that the -tools package
is needed anyway in these cases.
> So, that means that the tools package is always needed;
No, it isn't. mozilla-nss (the libs) are used by the mozilla
applications (and a few others) which don't need the tools. So it's not
_always_ needed to have a working NSS environment. It's _always_ needed
if "(pam_pkcs11, krb5-preauth-plugin-pkinit or something)" is used.
That's the difference.
> I asked on one
> of the opensuse lists (-gnome?) last week about this, but I guess
> you're not on that?
No, I'm not. I don't have anything to do with Gnome but I have much to
do with mozilla and NSS isn't Gnome related at all.
> Anyway I don't really care either way what the
> package layout is; we just need to make sure that both the libs and
> tools are both installed by anyone who needs nss.
OK, that's a valid point but the solution IMHO is not to add the tools
to the library package but having correct dependencies or patterns
reflecting the requirement.
Thanks for your feedback,
Wolfgang
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |