Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (322 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-factory] pdftk 1.41
- From: Carlos F Lange <carlos.lange@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:15:44 -0600
- Message-id: <200707260815.45161.carlos.lange@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Which version of pdftk is being included in 10.3?
I just found that version 1.41 shown here:
http://www.pdfhacks.com/pdftk/
also does stamping beside watermarking.
While watermarking works well placing background images on text-based
PDFs, such as from Latex, it does not work with scanned PDFs, because
the watermark in the background is completely covered by the scanned
image.
pdftk 1.41 can circumvent that by applying a stamp on the front of the
scanned images, according to the description. The website only has
version 1.41 compiled for Windows. The latest Suse version in the site
is 1.12, which is the same I have in Suse 10.1.
--
Carlos FL
Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I just found that version 1.41 shown here:
http://www.pdfhacks.com/pdftk/
also does stamping beside watermarking.
While watermarking works well placing background images on text-based
PDFs, such as from Latex, it does not work with scanned PDFs, because
the watermark in the background is completely covered by the scanned
image.
pdftk 1.41 can circumvent that by applying a stamp on the front of the
scanned images, according to the description. The website only has
version 1.41 compiled for Windows. The latest Suse version in the site
is 1.12, which is the same I have in Suse 10.1.
--
Carlos FL
Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |