Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (322 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] renaming of source packages proposal
- From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:43:40 +0200
- Message-id: <200707161643.41801.coolo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Am Montag 16 Juli 2007 schrieb Stanislav Brabec:
> Hallo.
>
> I saw many renames of packages in the last days. We follow shared
> library packaging conventions, but this policy says nothing about
> renaming of source package.
>
> I think, that it would be a good practice to use the same name for both
> devel and source package. It's more convenient and even simpler to do it
> in the spec.
>
> I propose to add following line to the Packaging/Shared Library
> Packaging Policy:
>
> "Source packages should in general omit $NUM as .src.rpm packages for
> different library versions and should follow -devel package naming."
>
>
> In practice it will bring more convenient .src.rpm naming and nicer spec
> files and less number of renames and drops in the repositories.
>
>
I don't see this followed in general. And just as we don't put "Don't shoot
yourself in the foot" in our policies, I don't think we should put everything
in there _not_ to do. Yeah, it opens some room for speculation and
interpretation, but that is ok. We're working with engineers - mostly
humans - not machines.
Just my 2 cents.
Greetings, Stephan
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hallo.
>
> I saw many renames of packages in the last days. We follow shared
> library packaging conventions, but this policy says nothing about
> renaming of source package.
>
> I think, that it would be a good practice to use the same name for both
> devel and source package. It's more convenient and even simpler to do it
> in the spec.
>
> I propose to add following line to the Packaging/Shared Library
> Packaging Policy:
>
> "Source packages should in general omit $NUM as .src.rpm packages for
> different library versions and should follow -devel package naming."
>
>
> In practice it will bring more convenient .src.rpm naming and nicer spec
> files and less number of renames and drops in the repositories.
>
>
I don't see this followed in general. And just as we don't put "Don't shoot
yourself in the foot" in our policies, I don't think we should put everything
in there _not_ to do. Yeah, it opens some room for speculation and
interpretation, but that is ok. We're working with engineers - mostly
humans - not machines.
Just my 2 cents.
Greetings, Stephan
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |