Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (322 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Dist Meeting 2007-07-05
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:32:47 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707051730580.24708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx> [2007-07-05 09:09]:
> > * Improve debuginfo packages
> >
> > To get a complete stack trace, we need several debuginfo packages.
> > The simple idea would be to copy dependencies from the main package to
> > the debuginfo package. But this would give too many dependencies
> > since it would lead to include always the gcc-debuginfo package
> > (currently 300 MB).
> >
> > Another idea is to reduce the size of debuginfo packages and mark them
> > only for backtrace - with removing the source code.
>
> But then I'd be for not removing the source code debug packages but
> split into -debuginfo and -debuginfo-source, for example.
>
> However, why not copying just the dependencies with a few exception,
> e.g. the gcc-debuginfo that you mentioned?
I would instead simply drop the source by default and provide a script
to unpack a source rpm at the place of the debuginfo sources. For
selected packages we might ship diffs from the original sources to the
compiled ones, but I doubt it matters for anything but glibc and the
kernel.
Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> * Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx> [2007-07-05 09:09]:
> > * Improve debuginfo packages
> >
> > To get a complete stack trace, we need several debuginfo packages.
> > The simple idea would be to copy dependencies from the main package to
> > the debuginfo package. But this would give too many dependencies
> > since it would lead to include always the gcc-debuginfo package
> > (currently 300 MB).
> >
> > Another idea is to reduce the size of debuginfo packages and mark them
> > only for backtrace - with removing the source code.
>
> But then I'd be for not removing the source code debug packages but
> split into -debuginfo and -debuginfo-source, for example.
>
> However, why not copying just the dependencies with a few exception,
> e.g. the gcc-debuginfo that you mentioned?
I would instead simply drop the source by default and provide a script
to unpack a source rpm at the place of the debuginfo sources. For
selected packages we might ship diffs from the original sources to the
compiled ones, but I doubt it matters for anything but glibc and the
kernel.
Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |