Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (850 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.2 Alpha4 - my installation report
- From: Robert Schiele <rschiele@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:11:49 +0200
- Message-id: <20060921121149.GK4249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > On the other hand, I'd like to hear more opinions of people who will use
> > this pattern for actual development purposes and not just building an
> > external module. How much sense does the pattern make without
> > kernel-debug being installed by default?
>
> Nobody has answered so far - so what should be done?
As I already mentioned would consider kernel-debug installed as the default
kernel a bug and thus would handle it in a similar way as the xen kernel in
the postinstall script. If you do so it can no longer hurt anyone installing
it by accident because it has to be booted in an explicit way if wanted.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
> > On the other hand, I'd like to hear more opinions of people who will use
> > this pattern for actual development purposes and not just building an
> > external module. How much sense does the pattern make without
> > kernel-debug being installed by default?
>
> Nobody has answered so far - so what should be done?
As I already mentioned would consider kernel-debug installed as the default
kernel a bug and thus would handle it in a similar way as the xen kernel in
the postinstall script. If you do so it can no longer hurt anyone installing
it by accident because it has to be booted in an explicit way if wanted.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
| < Previous | Next > |