Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (850 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Packages in default installation
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:56:30 +0200
- Message-id: <m3hczimv0x.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Robert Schiele <rschiele@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Christoph Thiel <cthiel@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> > cthiel@zion:~> rpm -q --whatrequires m4
>> > flex-2.5.31-18.5
>> > autoconf-2.59-92.3
>> > bison-2.1-13.3
>> > cthiel@zion:~>
>> >
>> > Could be dropped, IIUC.
>>
>> Let's hope that this is a complete list...
>
> Even if not, wouldn't it be smarter to _fix_ missing requirements instead of
> hiding them?
Yes, I agree - and that's what I did with make (filed a bug for now).
I just fear that my next installation will be broken because I removed
far too much ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Christoph Thiel <cthiel@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> > cthiel@zion:~> rpm -q --whatrequires m4
>> > flex-2.5.31-18.5
>> > autoconf-2.59-92.3
>> > bison-2.1-13.3
>> > cthiel@zion:~>
>> >
>> > Could be dropped, IIUC.
>>
>> Let's hope that this is a complete list...
>
> Even if not, wouldn't it be smarter to _fix_ missing requirements instead of
> hiding them?
Yes, I agree - and that's what I did with make (filed a bug for now).
I just fear that my next installation will be broken because I removed
far too much ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |