Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (599 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] SL-Factory vs. SL-Factory-debug
- From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:12:04 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608251807310.5380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Serving fools just creates a new fool.
So this should not be an "originary" aspect.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Andreas Hanke schrieb:
- Separate repositories for source packages - bad idea IMHO.
Why do you think this is a bad idea ?
Because they would be harder to find, resulting in fake GPL violation
discussions on this list :-(
Another point to consider: If it becomes possible to mirror the
distribution without the source RPMs, someone will do it; and if someone
does it, people will come back here and ask why there are just binaries
on a mirror and not the sources.
Brute-forcing mirrors to have the source RPMs by tying them together
with the binary RPMs is a desirable effect IMHO.
Serving fools just creates a new fool.
So this should not be an "originary" aspect.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |