Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (757 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Package Management Design and Experience
  • From: Volker Kuhlmann <hidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 00:56:25 +1200
  • Message-id: <20060530125625.GG6685@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> This is mandated by the switch to repomd. repomd's design doesn't allow
> downloading only a subset of metadata because all metadata are stored in
> a single XML file. (It's actually not a single XML file, but the effect
> is the same as if it were.)

Whatever the reason, it SUCKS. (And it's not nice without a progress
indicator.) This is half a show stopper. I doubt any of my $RELATIVES on
dialup are going to download >10MB every few days just to find out that
a package they haven't installed was updated.

> b) Major modifications to the repomd standard. Not possible without a
> consensus between all parties that use it.

Good scheme. An upwards-compatible way should be possible.

> Sorry, that doesn't really belong here. The usage of file name
> extensions is of course not specific to a certain platform.

This thread is about what's annoying about the package management. .exe
processes are. The .exe extension is specific to the mswindows platform
(can one say of legendary notoriety?).

> > At the very least, couldn't they call it .mono if they
> > really thought they couldn't do better?
>
> No, this would suggest that the assembly is specific to the Mono
> implementation of a CLI, which is not the case.

?? Are there more Linux applications than mono which produce this .exe
cr*p? If the executable is unspecific, why was an extension used at all?

Volker

--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.

< Previous Next >
This Thread