Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (542 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Nagios 2.0
- From: "Ciro Iriarte" <cyruspy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:32:11 -0400
- Message-id: <a998a0140602171732k3d54b0abu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2006/2/16, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:01:29AM +0000, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> > Are you talking about the official tar from nagios.sourceforge.net?.
> > It's an option, but that way i'm losing the init scripts for
> > example... Am i right?.
>
> There's one thing about this discussion/lamenting that I don't
> understand: nagios 2 has been production quality for a while and
> has been at least as good as 1.x for more than 2 Suse releases. The
> major step from 2beta to 2release was that documentation was "complete".
> We've been using 2.x from alpha stage onwards with networks of more than
> 2000 manged components. So, what I just don't get: Why does the release
> of 2.0 make a switch from 1.x to 2.0 so urgent now?
>
> ciao
> Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory-help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Being "Stable" was a requirenment to include it with the distro according
to the Wiki.
Ciro
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:01:29AM +0000, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> > Are you talking about the official tar from nagios.sourceforge.net?.
> > It's an option, but that way i'm losing the init scripts for
> > example... Am i right?.
>
> There's one thing about this discussion/lamenting that I don't
> understand: nagios 2 has been production quality for a while and
> has been at least as good as 1.x for more than 2 Suse releases. The
> major step from 2beta to 2release was that documentation was "complete".
> We've been using 2.x from alpha stage onwards with networks of more than
> 2000 manged components. So, what I just don't get: Why does the release
> of 2.0 make a switch from 1.x to 2.0 so urgent now?
>
> ciao
> Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory-help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Being "Stable" was a requirenment to include it with the distro according
to the Wiki.
Ciro
| < Previous | Next > |