Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (542 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] FTP installation of factory
- From: "Joseph M. Gaffney" <CuCullin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:43:16 -0500
- Message-id: <200602081443.16510.CuCullin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 14:06, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Frank-Michael Fischer <fmfischer@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > Does anyone have an idea, why my installation of the opensuse-factory
> > via FTP fails both ways, when going via internet or from my local rsync
> > mirror? When going local FTP, installation complains there are no
> > packages groups available after choosing Gnome or KDE. When going
> > internet the installation just hangs at "Software Auswahl" without
> > complaining.
>
> Wait for the next sync tomorrow, we're currently integrating our new
> packagemanager,
>
> Andreas
I thought Friday was the new date?
As an update to my comment made in the status meeting, yum does not handle
srpm's. I still believe, not for this version for obvious reasons, that
being able to handle srpm's through the package manager is a Very Good Thing
(TM). Perhaps this can go onto a wishlist for the future... I'll try and put
down a good idea of what I think would work, why, etc, and post up a feature
request once I can.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
> Frank-Michael Fischer <fmfischer@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > Does anyone have an idea, why my installation of the opensuse-factory
> > via FTP fails both ways, when going via internet or from my local rsync
> > mirror? When going local FTP, installation complains there are no
> > packages groups available after choosing Gnome or KDE. When going
> > internet the installation just hangs at "Software Auswahl" without
> > complaining.
>
> Wait for the next sync tomorrow, we're currently integrating our new
> packagemanager,
>
> Andreas
I thought Friday was the new date?
As an update to my comment made in the status meeting, yum does not handle
srpm's. I still believe, not for this version for obvious reasons, that
being able to handle srpm's through the package manager is a Very Good Thing
(TM). Perhaps this can go onto a wishlist for the future... I'll try and put
down a good idea of what I think would work, why, etc, and post up a feature
request once I can.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
| < Previous | Next > |