Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-edu (171 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-linux-uk-schools] BBC content
- From: "Mark Evans" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:19:55 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <20020516091953.609.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> There is a lot of controversy at present because the BBC propose to put _150m
> into content development with free access for schools. The traditional
Certainly not free of charge though, since just about
every school has (or should have) a TV licence.
> suppliers such as RM are squealing because they believe it will damage their
> business. Isn't this another side to the free software argument? Shouldn't
Maybe instead the BBC should supply content entitled
"Free Market 101" and send complementry copies to
RM
> the BBC make the content available under the GPL and then others could use it
> and develop additional resources all free? The main argument of RM et al
> seems to be that it will kill development because the commercial developers
> will not be able to compete. Since the same money will be available I don't
Then they'll have to sell a product they can make
money on. Commercial enterprises do not have
a god given right to make a profit at all.
> think that argument holds water since the BBC can't cover every single aspect
> of education. I see this initiative as potentially complementary to free
> software, especially if we could persuade the BBC to release its content
> under the GPL - after all, its our license fees paying for it.
> There is a lot of controversy at present because the BBC propose to put _150m
> into content development with free access for schools. The traditional
Certainly not free of charge though, since just about
every school has (or should have) a TV licence.
> suppliers such as RM are squealing because they believe it will damage their
> business. Isn't this another side to the free software argument? Shouldn't
Maybe instead the BBC should supply content entitled
"Free Market 101" and send complementry copies to
RM
> the BBC make the content available under the GPL and then others could use it
> and develop additional resources all free? The main argument of RM et al
> seems to be that it will kill development because the commercial developers
> will not be able to compete. Since the same money will be available I don't
Then they'll have to sell a product they can make
money on. Commercial enterprises do not have
a god given right to make a profit at all.
> think that argument holds water since the BBC can't cover every single aspect
> of education. I see this initiative as potentially complementary to free
> software, especially if we could persuade the BBC to release its content
> under the GPL - after all, its our license fees paying for it.
| < Previous | Next > |