Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-edu (179 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-linux-uk-schools] LTSP
- From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <E16VqqF-0007Dy-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 8:11 am, s-clarob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Does anyone know the minimum specification for an LTSP client?
I suppose it depends on what you mean by minimum spec. I believe (don't
quote me) that it will runn on a 386, 16MB RAM, 1MB vid card, and a bootable
NIC.
A more realistic minimum spec would be a 486, 16MB RAM, 4MB vid card.
> Is it faster than using VNC?
On a 386/16MB I would think so. Bear in mind, VNC has to sit on top of
something else and I've personally never got the DOS version working.
>
> Ta Rob.
All this is hearsay as I'm at the start of my LTSP project not at the end.
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
> Does anyone know the minimum specification for an LTSP client?
I suppose it depends on what you mean by minimum spec. I believe (don't
quote me) that it will runn on a 386, 16MB RAM, 1MB vid card, and a bootable
NIC.
A more realistic minimum spec would be a 486, 16MB RAM, 4MB vid card.
> Is it faster than using VNC?
On a 386/16MB I would think so. Bear in mind, VNC has to sit on top of
something else and I've personally never got the DOS version working.
>
> Ta Rob.
All this is hearsay as I'm at the start of my LTSP project not at the end.
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
| < Previous | Next > |