Hello, on Montag, 16. April 2007, Benji Weber wrote:
It is a concern, definitely. Do you have other suggestions? What wording would you prefer and why?
It's not an installation source , it is somewhere the user can find and install packages from. I would suggest:
Software Repository
Or just "Repository" (which can easily be shortened to "repo" when someone is too lazy to type ;-) Another reason for this name is that the repomd format is used ;-) and you have *.repo files and repodata/ directories on software.opensuse.org. Hmm, wasn't there a discussion on -factory some time ago already? Ah, here it is: "How to name that 'thing'?" http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2006-11/msg00445.html You should read the whole thread there (it's really interesting and has some good mails), but the best of it is: | > If you are looking for something new, try "(software) directory". | | Or to be even more innovative: Make this a configure option in YaST. [> Karl Eichwalder and Robert Schiele] ;-))
Software Catalogue.
I don't like this one. Catalogue reminds me to those kilo-weighted dead trees where you can order clothes etc. My point is: a Catalogue contains only the description, not the real product - but the openSUSE media (CD, DVD, FTP, whatever) _do_ contain the real product (aka packages).
Source doesn't really explain what it is, and is too confusable with source code.
I don't thing "Installation Source" is problematic and/or can be confused with program sources, but there are people whe differ. For me, "Repository" and "Installation Source" would be OK. Regards, Christian Boltz -- "Never surf faster, than your guardian penguin can fly!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-doc+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-doc+help@opensuse.org