Hallo,
sorry für die Störung durch diese Mail, aber werdet Ihr etwas schlauer,
als ich :-)? Ich bekomme solche Meldungen seit zwei- drei Tagen und ist
ziemlich blöd. Ich habe schon an ruediger.michels@inka-net.de (steht im
header) eine Nachricht verschickt, hier die Antwort.
Was passiert denn da?
Tibor
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System -----
From: Mail Delivery System
To: tibor-attila.anca@urz.uni-hd.de
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:48 +0100
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
richie@localhost
Connection refused:
retry timeout exceeded
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path:
Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de
by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 1AOwwa-0005TS-00; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:48 +0100
Received: from dsl.privat (bVDD6eZawe2nN4HlCQhrx1IZvrbsH4OdUSi71JkqybTyEN6RDjZEkW@[217.233.126.117]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 1AOwwM-0P3vNI0; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428581967F
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172E818F8B
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From:
X-Envelope-To:
X-Delivery-Time: 1069841922
Received: from post.strato.de [192.67.198.2]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for richie@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212])
by mailin.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAQAIgep003142
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAQAIeiv001133
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:40 +0100 (MET)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA20876
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:40 +0100
Received: (qmail 19763 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2003 10:18:39 -0000
Received: from ?217.82.224.73? (HELO susetux.bonn.de) (217.82.224.73)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 10:18:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by susetux.bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA6C1A0F
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by susetux.bonn.de (Postfix, from userid 500)
id CAEF81A0B; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:36 +0100
From: Anca Tibor- Attila
To: ruediger.michels@inka-net.de
Subject: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-ID: <20031126101836.GC3482@susetux.bonn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: SusE-Linux 9.0 Professional
Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre5
X-Seen: false
X-ID: bVDD6eZawe2nN4HlCQhrx1IZvrbsH4OdUSi71JkqybTyEN6RDjZEkW@t-dialin.net
Hallo,
diese und ähnliche Mails kriege ich nicht zum ersten Mal. Was ist da los
auf dem System?
Tibor
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System -----
From: Mail Delivery System
To: tibor-attila.anca@urz.uni-hd.de
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:32:21 +0100
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
richie@localhost
Connection refused:
retry timeout exceeded
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path:
Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de
by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 1AOw0B-00076X-01; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:27 +0100
Received: from dsl.privat (SULgZUZLYeiu8gvhylGtVuADvnG-vVxyC5oSxK+v5-iJpEV-xx-PkE@[217.233.126.117]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 1AOw04-1KgDjM0; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:20 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1D52C438
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC74419148
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From:
X-Envelope-To:
X-Delivery-Time: 1069838508
Received: from post.strato.de [192.67.198.62]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for richie@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lists.suse.com (lists.suse.com [195.135.221.131])
by mailin.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hAQ9LmuR001361
for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:21:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: (qmail 20430 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 09:21:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: mailto:suse-linux@suse.com
List-Help: mailto:suse-linux-help@suse.com
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:suse-linux-unsubscribe-ruediger.michels=inka-net.de@suse.com
X-MIME-Notice: attachments may have been removed from this message
X-Mailinglist: suse-linux
X-Message-Number-for-archive: 281100
Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux@suse.com
Received: (qmail 20420 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 09:21:45 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:21:38 +0100
From: Anca Tibor- Attila
To: SuSE ML
Subject: AntiVir oder F-Prot?
Message-ID: <20031126092138.GA3482@susetux.bonn.de>
Mail-Followup-To: SuSE ML
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: SusE-Linux 9.0 Professional
Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre5
X-Seen: false
X-ID: SULgZUZLYeiu8gvhylGtVuADvnG-vVxyC5oSxK+v5-iJpEV-xx-PkE@t-dialin.net
Hallo,
ich hätte mal eine "Erfahrungsfrage". Ich habe auf meinem Rechner
AntiVir Personal und läuft gut.
In der nächsten Zeit werde ich wahrscheinlich zu einem Laptop berufen,
wo ich sehr wahrscheinlich einen Virenscanner für Mails auch einrichten
muss. Nun die Frage, aber bitte keine Webseitenstatistiken, sondern eher
eigene Erfahrungen!
Wie würdet ihr Antivir und F-Prot beurteilen? Was ist schneller, welches
Programm hat bessere Erkennungsraten? AntiVir liefert manchmal täglich
mehrere Signaturupdates; wie ist das bei F-Prot?
Schon mal vielen Dank,
Tibor
P.S.: Aspekte, die ich vergessen habe könnt ihr auch gerne einfügen...
--
Um die Liste abzubestellen, schicken Sie eine Mail an:
suse-linux-unsubscribe@suse.com
Um eine Liste aller verfuegbaren Kommandos zu bekommen, schicken
Sie eine Mail an: suse-linux-help@suse.com
----- End forwarded message -----
----- End forwarded message -----