On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 at 00:48 (+0200), Bernhard Walle wrote: [...] Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass diese Mail doppelt ankam. Daraufhin habe ich mir den Header der zweiten Mail angeschaut und der ist mir irgendwie komisch vorgekommen: ,--- | From <Bernhard.Walle@gmx.de> Thu Aug 22 01:04:09 2002 | Envelope-to: <bwalle@localhost> | Return-path: <Bernhard.Walle@gmx.de> | Received: from 127.0.0.1 by hugo.local with esmtp (masqmail 0.2.6) id | 17heWH-0gt-01 for <bwalle@localhost>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:04:09 +0200 | X-Flags: 0000 | Delivered-To: GMX delivery to bernhard.walle@gmx.de | Received: from pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] | by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) | for bwalle@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:04:09 +0200 (CEST) | Received: (qmail 26171 invoked by uid 0); 21 Aug 2002 23:01:18 -0000 | Received: from d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com (195.212.91.199) | by mx0.gmx.net (mx017-rz3) with SMTP; 21 Aug 2002 23:01:18 -0000 | Received: from d12relay01.de.ibm.com (d12relay01.de.ibm.com [9.165.215.22]) | by d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7LN1HcU039480 | for <Bernhard.Walle@gmx.de>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:01:17 +0200 | Received: from d12ml028.de.ibm.com (d12ml028_cs0 [9.165.223.24]) | by d12relay01.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.3) with ESMTP id g7LN1HSh078676 | for <Bernhard.Walle@gmx.de>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:01:17 +0200 | Received: from d12relay01.de.ibm.com ([9.165.215.22]) | by d12hubm3.de.ibm.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.9a) | with ESMTP id 2002082200520057:252 ; | Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:52:00 +0200 | Received: from d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com (d12lmsgate.emea.ibm.com [9.165.215.9]) | by d12relay01.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.3) with ESMTP id g7LMq1Se095114 | for <masch@de.ibm.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:52:01 +0200 | Received: from lists.suse.com (lists.suse.com [217.9.113.69]) | by d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g7LMpxcU040958 | for <masch@de.ibm.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:51:59 +0200 | Received: (qmail 6326 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2002 22:51:47 -0000 | Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm | Precedence: bulk | List-Post: mailto:suse-linux@suse.com | List-Help: mailto:suse-linux-help@suse.com | List-Unsubscribe: mailto:suse-linux-unsubscribe-masch=de.ibm.com@suse.com | X-MIME-Notice: attachments may have been removed from this message | X-Mailinglist: suse-linux | Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux@suse.com | Received: (qmail 6306 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2002 22:51:47 -0000 | Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:48:36 +0200 | From: Bernhard Walle <Bernhard.Walle@gmx.de> | To: suse-linux@suse.com | Subject: Re: GUI ("KlickiBunti") vs. CLI (was: Re: SuSE 8.1 Debian Woody) | Message-ID: <20020821224836.GA798@mail1.bwalle.de> | Mail-Followup-To: suse-linux@suse.com | References: <200208211926.14020.qbert@t-online.de> <003e01c2495b$06e92730$0201a8c0@bodo> | Mime-Version: 1.0 | In-Reply-To: <003e01c2495b$06e92730$0201a8c0@bodo> | User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i | X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on D12HUBM3/12/H/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at | 22/08/2002 00:52:00, | Serialize by Router on D12HUBM3/12/H/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at | 22/08/2002 01:01:14 | X-Notes-Item: 20; | type=300; name=$Hops | X-Notes-Item: Memo; | name=Form | X-Notes-Item: ; | type=501; flags=44; name=$UpdatedBy | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 | Content-Disposition: inline | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable `---- Es sind erhebliche Abweichungen von "normalen" Listenheader festzustellen: * Die Mail ist innerhalb von IBM rumgewandert. * Die Mail wurde in QuotedPrintable kodiert, obwohl ich alle Mails mit 8bit verschicke. * Lotus Notes hat anscheinend noch einige Header hinzugefügt. Hat jemand eine Idee, warum das so ist? Gruß, Bernhard -- _________ http://www.bwalle.de _________________________________________________ "If you put your mind to it...you can do anything." -- Jono Bacon