Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-contrib (154 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-contrib] Fwd: [opensuse-factory] The Future of Factory/Contrib
- From: Vladimir Nadvornik <nadvornik@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:35:43 +0200
- Message-id: <200906031935.43711.nadvornik@xxxxxxx>
Hi,
On st 3. Ĩervna 2009, Petr Uzel wrote:
I'd vote for this.
IMHO the smaller devel projects are more suitable for this.
I'd expect that packages built for multiple distros at once won't be tested
that good on older distros. Pushing such packages to end users via generic
repository is quite dangerous.
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On st 3. Ĩervna 2009, Petr Uzel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:10:30PM +0200, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
I think that Contrib with version upgrades is a way to go. There were
some people that wanted to help with Contrib, but dropped when they
realized that no version upgrades were allowed there.
I have the same opinion - make Contrib a repository with less strict
rules than Factory has.
If we decide to go this way, I see two 'subpossibilities' :
3a) freeze/branch Contrib when new openSUSE release is out (i.e.
openSUSE:11.1:Contrib), but allow version upgrades if there's a bug
I'd vote for this.
or
3b) do not branch Contrib at all, but build it for older openSUSE
versions (like we are now building for 11.1).
IMHO the smaller devel projects are more suitable for this.
I'd expect that packages built for multiple distros at once won't be tested
that good on older distros. Pushing such packages to end users via generic
repository is quite dangerous.
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |