Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-contrib (276 mails)

[Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@xxxxxxx>]

Sascha 'saigkill' Manns wrote:
> Project: home:saigkill
> Package: libatlas3
>
> Hi Mates,
>
> i would like to submit the libatlas3 Package to Contrib. But i have some 
> RPMLint Warnings. Can anyone help me?
>
> ---Snip---
> libatlas3.x86_64: W: shared-lib-without-dependency-information 
> /usr/lib64/libcblas.so
> * That i don't know how to fix

libcblas contain no dependency information, maybe it is linked with
-avoid-version switch. You should come with

libcblas.so
- and for example -
libcblas.so.1 and libcblas.so.1.2.3

> libatlas3.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-lib
> Your package starts with 'lib' as part of it's name, but does not 
> provide any libraries. It must not be called a lib-package then. Give it 
> a more sensible name.
> * Should i just make an Provides Tag with the LIb?

Related to the previous issue.

> libatlas3.x86_64: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libcblas.so
> libatlas3.x86_64: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libf77blas.so
> libatlas3.x86_64: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libatlas.so
> Your package matches the Shared Library Policy Naming Scheme but 
> contains an unversioned library. Therefore it is very unlikely that your 
> package can be installed in parallel to another version of this library 
> package. Consider moving unversioned parts into a runtime package.
> * Must i change this? How can i change this? 

Again, related to the first issue.

> libatlas3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libcblas.so
> libatlas3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libatlas.so
> libatlas3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object/usr/lib64/libf77blas.so
> * Should i fix this?

No, it's OK. It happens because you don't have debug packages enabled in
your home project. It will get fixed on the package is in Contrib.

> libatlas3-devel.x86_64: W: zero-length 
> /usr/include/atlas/atlas_ctrsmXover.h
> libatlas3-devel.x86_64: W: zero-length 
> /usr/include/atlas/atlas_strsmXover.h
> libatlas3-devel.x86_64: W: zero-length 
> /usr/include/atlas/atlas_dtrsmXover.h
> libatlas3-devel.x86_64: W: zero-length 
> /usr/include/atlas/atlas_ztrsmXover.h
> * On this Place i think, i can just remove them in %install Section. Or 
> is this an bad Solution?

Don't remove them, they are just warnings and compiler will probably
complain about the missing includes anyway.

> ---Snap---
>
> Excuse my many Questions. But this is an very big Package, with 6 or 
> more Makefiles. 


-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol RUSNAK                                       SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
Package Maintainer                                Lihovarska 1060/12
PGP 0xA6917144                                     19000 Praha 9, CR
prusnak[at]suse.cz                                http://www.suse.cz
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx