Why do we need two tools? Here're some questions and comments that come to my mind: * osc has already a local build option. * build and osc build both setup a local chroot * for documentation it's easier to describe only one tool and not two. * Do both share the same libraries and routines? Or do we reinvent the wheel everytime? * build uses the local media - why can't osc do the same * osc calculates the build dependencies on the server, build on the local machine. Why can't an osc local build do it on the local machine? I'm not getting yet why we need two tools. The build service has changed many ways we used to work - let's continue to thing out of the box, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126