Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (171 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] osc 0.121 candidate
- From: Peter Poeml <poeml@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:51:36 +0200
- Message-id: <20090904095136.GA12778@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:22:17 -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
I couldn't agree more.
Peter
--
"WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Marcus Hüwe<suse-tux@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-09-02 12:05:19 -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
If you want to disable this check add "check_filelist = 0" to thethere were plenty changes in osc svn, so it is time for a new release.
However, there might be unwanted incompatibilities, so I prepared first a
candidate in openSUSE:Tools:Unstable
I'd like to see the
File `somefile' is not in package meta. Would you like
skip/remove/edit file lists/commit/abort? (s/r/e/c/A)
part removed. I personally find it very annoying.
Also, the question itself doesn't really make sense.
"[general]"
section in your ~/.oscrc. IMHO it would be better if it only checks for
files
which are referenced in the spec file (SourceX, PatchX etc) instead of
checking
all files in the working copy.
OK. I have a few suggestions then:
1. document this. I don't see a sample oscrc anywhere in the package,
documenting all of the various options and such.
2. make the default, if no config item is present, to skip - this
preserves backwards compatability and allows those that desire to set
it up some other way.
3. Another option "warn" seems reasonable.
I couldn't agree more.
Peter
--
"WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development
| < Previous | Next > |