Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (349 mails)

["Dr. Peter Poeml" <poeml@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:52:24PM +0100, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 November 2007 17:21:43 wrote Dr. Peter Poeml:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > an equivalent for cvs rdiff would work without any checked out sources,
> > > > just
> > > >
> > > >  osc rdiff <TO_PROJECT> <TO_PACKAGE> [--package <FROM_PACKAGE>]
> > > > [--project <FROM_PROJECT>]
> > >
> > > It'd also need options for revision and orevision.
> > >
> > > How about
> > >
> > > osc rdiff [-rN[:M]] [[--oldprj OLD_PROJECT] --oldpkg OLD_PACKAGE]]
> > > NEW_PROJECT NEW_PACKAGE
> >
> > looks even better to me :)
> >
> > > One should note that the result is a "pretty diff", which goes into tar
> > > balls and is handy for reviews -- not a normal diff which yields an
> > > appliable patch.
> > >
> > > > hm, maybe even default to "--project openSUSE:Factory" if no argument is
> > > > given ...
> > >
> > > Maybe a good idea...
>
> While experimenting, I noticed that 
> https://api.opensuse.org/source/home:poeml/initviocons?cmd=diff&oproject=home%3Apoeml&opackage=initviocons
> returns a non-empty diff, even though package=opackage and
> project=oproject.
>
> Is this a diff to the last revision? It looks like that.

I hacked up an rdiff command, and committed it to svn.

I hope it works as expected.

The default behaviour, if opackage and oproject are not specified, is a
diff against the last revision -- not against Factory. So it behaves
similar like the backend.

The patch is also applied to the package tracking branch.

Peter
-- 
"WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!"
 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development