Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (349 mails)

[Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:27:45 Ben Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:43 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:05:51 Ben Martin wrote:
> > > This seems to work for F7,F8 and opensuse 10.3.
> > >
> > > I already had at the top of the specfile;
> > > %define   name foo
> >
> > Not needed.
>
> I had that in there already because the %{name} is used many times in
> the header of the package

Still not needed. Name: foo defines the %name macro for you.


> On Fedora 8:
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/21/fa83c1714247ffac3294880f6aa9c1f9a20636
> /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/21/fa83c1714247ffac3294880f6aa9c1f9a20636.debug
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfuselagefs.so.0.0.0.debug
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfuselagefs.so.0.debug
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfuselagefs.so.debug
> /usr/src/debug/fuselagefs-0.0.1/src/fuselagefs.cpp
> /usr/src/debug/fuselagefs-0.0.1/src/fuselagefs.hh
>
> On opensuse 10.3:
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfuselagefs.so.0.0.0.debug
>
> With the nastier brute force method I was using it would package on both
> platforms.
> package = ~/fuselagefs

Is this home:monkeyiq/fuselagefs? I'm not sure if it's the cause of the 
problem, but I see you "commented" out some macros in the spec. Unfortunately 
the way rpm parses specfiles is that it first evaluates macros and then 
strips comments. So your 
#%debug_package fuselagefs-debuginfo
line will results in an expansion of the %debug_package macro with the first 
line commented out.

hth,
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx