On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:29:41AM +0200, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:38:32PM +0200, Marcus Hüwe wrote:
On 2007-07-11 15:14:05 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
Sounds great! Unfortunately I have no idea how to figure out, which revisions are available. So what did I miss? [...] I just checked in the following change:
- implementing a provisionary log command for the commit log
- renamed log command to buildlog (short: bl)
- commit: implemented -m option for the commit message
- commit files together, if (and only if) do_commits = 1 is set in the [general] section of .oscrc
I found that I had already code in place for the commit with username and message, it was just waiting for a -m option, and actually the commit method is subject to change, but for now it could be useful nevertheless. However, it is hardly tested yet. Please, if you are willing to take a risk for certain packages, set do_commits = 1 in .oscrc and let me know how it works.
(If it works, the username and commit message can be seen in the commit log later.)
For me it works, and I haven't heard anything negative from anyone else about it. However, I suspect that I may be the only one actually using it. I have updated osc so the new commit mode is used automatically if a commit message is given, so it gets more coverage. (I have not forgotten that we are going to change the commit handling once more... as I wrote in the minutes of the last buildservice meeting. But I think it is worthwile to start implementing (and using) all the facilities now, which commit and revision handling brings about.) Peter -- "WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development