Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (209 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Proposal for project in root namespace: console
- From: Petr Cerny <pcerny@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:04:39 +0200
- Message-id: <468100D7.4010402@xxxxxxx>
Adrian Schröter wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:12:40 wrote Petr Cerny:
>> Michal Marek wrote:
>>> Petr Cerny wrote:
>>>> The fine thing with BS is, that you can link packages into projects. So
>>>> there is no problem having it in more projects and maintaining only once
>>>> (in home project for example). This way "mcabber" (mentioned by Pascal
>>>> Bleser) can be in network:clients and desktop:messaging and console:net.
>>>> I think there's nothing wrong with it.
>>> There is: It's a waste of bandwitdh and space on mirrors.
>> Than change in BS is necessary. Either "link" should
>> really do link or it should be renamed to avoid confusion.
>
> it is a source link and therfore the naming is right, but it results in
> multiple binary packages ...
OK, I see. Is the problem - creating package for the sake of logical
assignment into projects - solvable via "aggregate"?
Petr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:12:40 wrote Petr Cerny:
>> Michal Marek wrote:
>>> Petr Cerny wrote:
>>>> The fine thing with BS is, that you can link packages into projects. So
>>>> there is no problem having it in more projects and maintaining only once
>>>> (in home project for example). This way "mcabber" (mentioned by Pascal
>>>> Bleser) can be in network:clients and desktop:messaging and console:net.
>>>> I think there's nothing wrong with it.
>>> There is: It's a waste of bandwitdh and space on mirrors.
>> Than change in BS is necessary. Either "link" should
>> really do link or it should be renamed to avoid confusion.
>
> it is a source link and therfore the naming is right, but it results in
> multiple binary packages ...
OK, I see. Is the problem - creating package for the sake of logical
assignment into projects - solvable via "aggregate"?
Petr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |