"Dr. Peter Poeml"
10/02/06 3:15 PM >>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:08:34PM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote: Am Monday 02 October 2006 14:23 schrieb Leon Freitag: Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2006 14:38 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger: And else? Anybody else giving me a vote for the space on the BS? me! me! me!
and you are all aware that we have to drop ~ 50 other packages because of this ?
In this case, I can't vote for it, I did not know that space on the BS is such rare and one large package creates such a problem. Can't we demand more space for the BS? In the end, the BS is also an automated hosting service for packagers, part of which makes it so cool.
it does not matter right now, but it will in the future ...
Isn't it possible to supply such large amounts of data from by other means (outside the BS I mean)? Is it really architecture dependant, needs to be compiled and packaged and so on?
It is supplied outside the BS in runable binary form. It comes with an autopackage installer, and runs cleanly on OpenSUSE. However, for me this doesn't rule out the BS for me, as I would like to have the game in RPM form. Also, the BS would make it possibly available for other architectures, I am sure the developers would be happy to see someone build a x86_64 version of their game. And, with Dominique we have a person willing to keep a look at the project. However, if the space problem is such dramatic and can't be solved, forget it. I am against dropping other packages only for UFO:AI. Holger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org