On Thu 31 Aug 2006 18:58, Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote:
Em Qui, 2006-08-31 às 16:28 +0200, Marcus Rueckert escreveu:
while i agree that cactid should be in server:monitoring. i dont think that cheops-ng and kismet fit there.
Well, just like kismet, IMHO sflowtool and softflowd could also reside on somethink like "network:monitoring" or "network:security", because they're not specific for server use (well, "cactid" should also go into "network:monitoring").
Yes. My previous mail said exactly that :-) I dont think network:security is appropriate as flow programs are more about monitoring.. Not really security..
BTW, there's no such project called "network:monitoring".
Yes. Maybe there should be though. I created network:aaa yesterday, as I figured we really needed a "network" namespace in addition to "server". -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc