http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991266 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991266#c4 --- Comment #4 from Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.com> --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #3)
The license tag of libreoffice does not only contain know OSI open source licenses:
License : Apache-2.0 and Artistic-1.0 and BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause and GPL-2.0+ and LPPL-1.3c and LGPL-2.1+ and LGPL-3.0 and MPL-1.1 and MIT and SUSE-Public-Domain and W3C
At least SUSE-Public-Domain is not OSI Open Source (appstream knows about 'public domain' license, but in this case would actually assign the 'public domain' badge to this package (We can patch as-glib to handle SUSE-Public-Domain as 'Public Domain' - but that only changes the badge).
The question should rather be if this license tag is actually correct
Yes this license unfortunately is correct :( there are some parts of the LO licensed as public-domain... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.