http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991266
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991266#c3
Dominique Leuenberger changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(dimstar@opensuse. |
|org) |
--- Comment #3 from Dominique Leuenberger ---
The license tag of libreoffice does not only contain know OSI open source
licenses:
License : Apache-2.0 and Artistic-1.0 and BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause and
GPL-2.0+ and LPPL-1.3c and LGPL-2.1+ and LGPL-3.0 and MPL-1.1 and MIT and
SUSE-Public-Domain and W3C
At least SUSE-Public-Domain is not OSI Open Source (appstream knows about
'public domain' license, but in this case would actually assign the 'public
domain' badge to this package (We can patch as-glib to handle
SUSE-Public-Domain as 'Public Domain' - but that only changes the badge).
The question should rather be if this license tag is actually correct
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.