https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894331
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894331#c13
--- Comment #13 from Johannes Obermayr
(In reply to comment #11)
As you see above you may introduce other issues by providing devel-32bit packages.
The issue is about that someone updated the package and forgot to update the baselibs.conf file. [...] The devel-32bit package has nothing to do with the issue.
Nope. The issue is about: "multimedia:libs/glew: baselibs.conf is wrong -glew -glew-devel -libGLEW1_9 +libGLEW* glew and glew-devel don't have to be -32bit ..." Where we (namely I) pointed out: "Just found out /usr/lib/build/mkbaselibs cannot handle "*". So it must be "libGLEW1_10" and adapted each time ..." You committed: " glew glew-devel -libGLEW1_9 +libGLEW1_10" So we are still discussing glew(-32bit) and glew-devel(-32bit). Where the first one was agreed: "glew in baselibs.conf is not needed." We are now at the point whether it makes sense to have -devel-32bit packages (at all). There we (again I) pointed out -devel-32bit packages can lead to other issues (e. g. libdir determination via pkg-config [not for glew-devel]) and nobody is raising a hand to require glew-devel-32bit package under all circumstances. So I am voting to begin with removing useless glew-32bit and glew-devel-32bit package. "Sometimes less (not required packages) is more." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.