https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669804 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669804#c0 Summary: use libffi from upstream project rather than gcc's Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth@novell.com ReportedBy: d137@abv.bg QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/11.0.661.0 Chrome/11.0.661.0 Safari/534.18 In relation to bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657789 It should be best if we use libffi from upstream project rather than gcc's I was talking recently to the dev's of libffi. From my mail correspondation: On 02/06/2011 08:33 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
Ok it has been a while but I have one more question to that :) Can someone have a look at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657789 and tell me if this is the same libffi :D In openSUSE the libffi has a version number above 4, that does not contain libffi.pc (or did not before, because of my bug report they added a file manually for that). In the build service like I menitioned in the bug report I found a libffi that is the right one (3.0.9) with libffi.pc included.
Best regards, Damian
In my experience, the distributions that lack .pc file for libffi, are propably building the libffi from gcc's sources instead of this separate project. If that's the case, they should move from the gcc's libffi to this one. And that way the .pc will just "be there". my 2 cents Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.