http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608097
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608097#c2
Petr Mladek changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fstrba@novell.com
--- Comment #2 from Petr Mladek 2010-06-21 11:52:44 UTC ---
/usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.so is owned by the package libstlport_gcc4-devel. It is
also created but now owned by the package OpenOffice_org-ure.
The history is the following. The upstream extensions are linked against
libstlport_gcc.so. Our OOo packages are linked against the gcc STL. We
did not want to compile OOo with the crazy libstlport. We found that it would
work and it would even be safe to just install the compat libstlport package.
The /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.so symlink should be part of the devel package to
allow installation of more libstlport versions in parallel. Of course, we do
not want to require libstlport_gcc4-devel by OOo, so we create the symlink by
%post scripts in OpenOffice_org-ure.spec. I tried to use %ghost in
OpenOffice_org-ure
but it caused conflicts with libstlport_gcc4-devel package. So, I removed the
%ghost file from OpenOffice_org-ure and the hacky symlink is not longer owned
by any package until libstlport_gcc4-devel is installed.
Fridrich suggested it it might be enough if OpenOffice_org-ure creates the
symlink under /usr/lib/ooo3/ure/lib. I will try this for OOo-3.3.
BTW: I still do not understand why you need to install some packages with
--nodeps. Do you have any example of such package with broken dependencies?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
