http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500525
User nice@titanic.nyme.hu added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500525#c19
--- Comment #19 from Tamás Németh
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #11)
Now I realized that on Xen kernel neither s2dsik no s2ram does work.
I don't really think they are supported with Xen.
Yes, you may be right. Although Xen documentation seems to be outdated or nonexistent, it seems to me that there is no suspend/hibernate support in dom0:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq#head-cb7861c9865fc8fbae3bb472f04c5d...
From what I can tell, the support for suspend to RAM for Xen dom0 is being worked on, so there's a chance it will be there in future kernel versions.
But why down then KDE think that it will be able to do an s2ram? Is it a KDE or a kernel bug? I adore your efforts and this last kernel seems to be very cool, but maybe somehow misguides KDE?
I don't really know what method is used by KDE to check whether or not suspend to RAM is supported. It is likely, though, that the kernel reports support for suspend to RAM via /sys/power/state and that's what makes KDE think S2RAM is supported.
I've reported it here: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502193 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.