Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (9423 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[Bug 364741] No suggested partitioning provided by installation tool
- From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:46:41 -0700 (MST)
- Message-id: <20080307194641.64A32CC7B3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364741
User lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364741#c10
Lee Matheson <lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Lee Matheson <lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-03-07
12:46:41 MST ---
SuSE-9.3, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 never had a problem with the kernel during
the nominal install. BUT reading comment#9, made realize I should have tried
the "No ACPI" install.
My apologies, even though I've never had to do this No ACPI on this PC, I am
well aware of this Installation option, and I should have tried that.
So I tried the "NO ACPI" Install and the partition table showed up OK. I did
not proceed to do the install, but it appears to be functioning.
I'll try a full install later (possibly this weekend).
Hence I think that openSUSE-11.0 alpha2 appears to be functioning with the "No
ACPI" installation selection, and that takes this off the "CRITICAL" Severity,
and possibly is even enough to close this?
I propose to put the resolution as "FIXED" by that work around? (and I've
labeled the status accordingly). I hope my changing the status is OK (if it
accepts my change).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
User lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364741#c10
Lee Matheson <lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Lee Matheson <lee_matheson@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-03-07
12:46:41 MST ---
SuSE-9.3, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 never had a problem with the kernel during
the nominal install. BUT reading comment#9, made realize I should have tried
the "No ACPI" install.
My apologies, even though I've never had to do this No ACPI on this PC, I am
well aware of this Installation option, and I should have tried that.
So I tried the "NO ACPI" Install and the partition table showed up OK. I did
not proceed to do the install, but it appears to be functioning.
I'll try a full install later (possibly this weekend).
Hence I think that openSUSE-11.0 alpha2 appears to be functioning with the "No
ACPI" installation selection, and that takes this off the "CRITICAL" Severity,
and possibly is even enough to close this?
I propose to put the resolution as "FIXED" by that work around? (and I've
labeled the status accordingly). I hope my changing the status is OK (if it
accepts my change).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
| < Previous | Next > |