Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (15092 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[Bug 309009] sax2: segfault in sysp server detection
- From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:07:44 -0600 (MDT)
- Message-id: <20070912080744.EAFC1CC789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309009#c8
Marcus Schaefer <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Info Provider| |bh-novell@xxxxxxxxx
--- Comment #8 from Marcus Schaefer <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> 2007-09-12 02:07:44 MST ---
Hmm, this is strange it works in manual installation and by manual call
of sax2. As far as I know the automatic installation calls the same ycp
code within YaST and therefore there is no difference in the libsax api
calls. I'm a bit confused and can't reproduce this.
The trace you sent doesn't show a sig_segfault or I missed something.
Is this a trace from a segfault try ?
If you could reproduce it please call:
gdb sysp
run -s server
bt
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Marcus Schaefer <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Info Provider| |bh-novell@xxxxxxxxx
--- Comment #8 from Marcus Schaefer <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> 2007-09-12 02:07:44 MST ---
Hmm, this is strange it works in manual installation and by manual call
of sax2. As far as I know the automatic installation calls the same ycp
code within YaST and therefore there is no difference in the libsax api
calls. I'm a bit confused and can't reproduce this.
The trace you sent doesn't show a sig_segfault or I missed something.
Is this a trace from a segfault try ?
If you could reproduce it please call:
gdb sysp
run -s server
bt
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
| < Previous | Next > |