Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (6120 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[Bug 285101] fuse module loaded by default
- From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:58:21 -0600 (MDT)
- Message-id: <20070730165821.B6E2A245366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285101#c26
--- Comment #26 from Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> 2007-07-30 10:58:21 MST ---
> As ntfs-3g (unless I link it statically) need libfuse and long as it is used
> with root privileges, it does not need fusermount installed or fuse
> started in any way, we could solve this by splitting off fuse to:
>
> * libfuse2 - contains libfuse (is installed when ntfs-3g is installed)
> * fuse2 - contains fusermount, mount.fuse, the rc script and docs
I'd call the package just "fuse" or "fuse-utils".
Otherwise this sounds fine. Do we want *fs packages to depend on the fuse
package? Or should the user need to install fuse separately to have a working
filesystem?
> and possibly separate ulockmgr packages. Regarding that:
>
> As far as I can see, none of the openSUSE-included rpms which use fuse (checked
> curlftpfs encfs fuseiso fusepod fusesmb gphotofs obexfs sshfs wdfs and compiz)
> use libulockmgr, so I guess that it does not make huge sense to ship it?
I'm not yet aware of any users, so can just drop it for the moment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--- Comment #26 from Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> 2007-07-30 10:58:21 MST ---
> As ntfs-3g (unless I link it statically) need libfuse and long as it is used
> with root privileges, it does not need fusermount installed or fuse
> started in any way, we could solve this by splitting off fuse to:
>
> * libfuse2 - contains libfuse (is installed when ntfs-3g is installed)
> * fuse2 - contains fusermount, mount.fuse, the rc script and docs
I'd call the package just "fuse" or "fuse-utils".
Otherwise this sounds fine. Do we want *fs packages to depend on the fuse
package? Or should the user need to install fuse separately to have a working
filesystem?
> and possibly separate ulockmgr packages. Regarding that:
>
> As far as I can see, none of the openSUSE-included rpms which use fuse (checked
> curlftpfs encfs fuseiso fusepod fusesmb gphotofs obexfs sshfs wdfs and compiz)
> use libulockmgr, so I guess that it does not make huge sense to ship it?
I'm not yet aware of any users, so can just drop it for the moment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
| < Previous | Next > |