https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281855 ------- Comment #8 from bluedzins@wp.pl 2007-06-11 05:49 MST ------- Stefan,
Your example above could be written like this: ((sound|advanced).*){2}
No, it will match sound x sound Still, you didn't give solution how to express _simple_ query using regexp, and regular user is supposed to do it? Btw. thanks for regexp explanation but I am familiar with it.
If QRegExp can't do it, we won't invest considerable manpower to implement it.
Yes, single regexp cannot do this (afaik), several regexps -- can.
With regard to new search modes, this would be WONTFIX:
And nobody will be able to search for simple things. I don't understand such decision -- I am not opting for another mode, but enhancing current one. Using several regexps under the hood -- that's all. Forcing user to manually crawl through the output to find out the second part of the query... people doing computer job :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.