Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (6406 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[Bug 259718] Sub-pixel antialising does not work when set from KDE Control Center
- From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:29:59 -0600 (MDT)
- Message-id: <20070410182959.C311FDBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=259718
------- Comment #19 from cmorve69@xxxxxxxx 2007-04-10 12:29 MST -------
But this is any different from the TrueType Bytecode Interpreter (Apple
patents) case? It is enabled/compiled in freetype2... but no in freetype¿?
The situation in openSUSE 10.2 is:
Freetype: Bytecode Interpreter disabled (Apple)
Freetype: Has sub-pixel antialising support? If so, is enabled?
Freetype2: Bytecode Interpreter enabled (Apple)
Freetype2: Sub-pixel antialising disabled (Microsoft)
Shouldn't them be both enabled or both disabled?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Comment #19 from cmorve69@xxxxxxxx 2007-04-10 12:29 MST -------
But this is any different from the TrueType Bytecode Interpreter (Apple
patents) case? It is enabled/compiled in freetype2... but no in freetype¿?
The situation in openSUSE 10.2 is:
Freetype: Bytecode Interpreter disabled (Apple)
Freetype: Has sub-pixel antialising support? If so, is enabled?
Freetype2: Bytecode Interpreter enabled (Apple)
Freetype2: Sub-pixel antialising disabled (Microsoft)
Shouldn't them be both enabled or both disabled?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
| < Previous | Next > |