Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (8048 mails)

[bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx]

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118131


cornelis@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cornelis@xxxxxxxxx




------- Comment #83 from cornelis@xxxxxxxxx  2007-02-08 12:07 MST -------
(In reply to comment #62)
> I just noticed that Rene added the patch from
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64508 to ooo-build HEAD a week
> ago; would be probably worth re-testing when the package (OOo 2.1) gets to
> STABLE...
> 
The original patch has been changed in ooo-build (quote from webcvs):

Revision 8325 - (view) (download) - [select for diffs] 
 Modified Fri Dec 8 03:02:01 2006 UTC (2 months ago) by jiaojh 
File length: 36773 byte(s) 
Diff to previous 8293 
Modify FcConfigSubstitute's third patameter to FcMatchPattern to make
FcPatternGetBool
get FC_EMBEDDED_BITMAP correctly.

"FcMatchPattern" was "FcMatchFont". I'm no programmer, but suse-hinting.conf
has the following lines:

<!--
    Set autohinter=true as the default, then add exceptions for certain fonts:
-->

        <match target="pattern">
                <edit name="autohint">
                        <bool>true</bool>
                </edit>
        </match>

Can it be that this "pattern" is read by OO.o 2.1 and that it ignores <match
target "font"> stuff in suse-hinting.conf and that it always uses the
autohinter? When I change this setting to "false", I get nice fonts in OO.o.
(btw. I haven't updated freetype).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.