Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (9872 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[Bug 194711] IBM Java 1.4.2 & 1.5.0 does not work with newest glibc
- From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:31:02 -0700 (MST)
- Message-id: <20070124013102.E51D325C887@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194711
------- Comment #57 from bugproxy@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-23 18:31 MST -------
----- Additional Comments From suzukikp@xxxxxxxxxx (prefers email at
suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx) 2007-01-23 20:27 EDT -------
I checked the glibc-2.5-29 rpm, and the problem is still reproducible there. As
with the earlier versions, the objdump fails with the "object file format not
recognized" error for the ld file.
If I am not wrong, this was not seen with glibc-2.5-24 rpm. But started with
glibc-2.5-25 rpm. I took a diff of the entire source tree for both of these
versions. I could find no difference between them :(.
Unfortunately I lost the glibc-2.5-24 rpm. Could you try if it passes for you ?
Thanks
Suzuki
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Comment #57 from bugproxy@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-23 18:31 MST -------
----- Additional Comments From suzukikp@xxxxxxxxxx (prefers email at
suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx) 2007-01-23 20:27 EDT -------
I checked the glibc-2.5-29 rpm, and the problem is still reproducible there. As
with the earlier versions, the objdump fails with the "object file format not
recognized" error for the ld file.
If I am not wrong, this was not seen with glibc-2.5-24 rpm. But started with
glibc-2.5-25 rpm. I took a diff of the entire source tree for both of these
versions. I could find no difference between them :(.
Unfortunately I lost the glibc-2.5-24 rpm. Could you try if it passes for you ?
Thanks
Suzuki
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
| < Previous | Next > |