Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-autoinstall (25 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-autoinstall] disabling powersaved in qutoyast config?
- From: PGNet <pgnet.trash+osyast@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:35:31 -0800
- Message-id: <dbd51810902160935haf80fb5r358579aa20e12efa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Uwe Gansert <ug@xxxxxxx> wrote:
that was the right question for me to finally 'get it'.
powersaved was a 'problematic' (to me ...) package that _had_ been
available in 11.0,
http://packages.opensuse-community.org/index.jsp?distro=openSUSE_110&searchTerm=powersave
and, as you've correctly pointed out, is _not_ in 11.1.
this autoyast config was migrated from 11.0 -> 11.1, and i did not
remove the reference to powersaved, wanting to ensure it was disabled
... but, not realizing that it had 'gone away'.
what i failed to realize is that autoyast installation would 'fail'
(or interrupt, as described here) if a stanza was included to disable
a service that did not exist.
for 11.1, removing that stanza, the error goes away.
which raises a question --
i agree that a service EN-able should fail/interrupt if autoyast is
faced with a missing service, but should a DIS-able also fail if the
service doesn't exist?
or, rather, simply pass-thru with no error/no action?
personally, i lean towards the former ... but, the latter might make sense.
thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Uwe Gansert <ug@xxxxxxx> wrote:
where do you get it? It's not on my 11.1 installation source at all?
that was the right question for me to finally 'get it'.
powersaved was a 'problematic' (to me ...) package that _had_ been
available in 11.0,
http://packages.opensuse-community.org/index.jsp?distro=openSUSE_110&searchTerm=powersave
and, as you've correctly pointed out, is _not_ in 11.1.
this autoyast config was migrated from 11.0 -> 11.1, and i did not
remove the reference to powersaved, wanting to ensure it was disabled
... but, not realizing that it had 'gone away'.
what i failed to realize is that autoyast installation would 'fail'
(or interrupt, as described here) if a stanza was included to disable
a service that did not exist.
for 11.1, removing that stanza, the error goes away.
which raises a question --
i agree that a service EN-able should fail/interrupt if autoyast is
faced with a missing service, but should a DIS-able also fail if the
service doesn't exist?
or, rather, simply pass-thru with no error/no action?
personally, i lean towards the former ... but, the latter might make sense.
thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |