Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-autoinstall (110 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-autoinstall] SELS 10 GM vs. SLES 10 RC2 autoyast changes?
- From: Pete Nishimoto <peten@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060804103759.07a757b8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Uwe,
Putting all the stuff from the DVD at the 'root' level cleared it up for 32 and 64 bit
(using the DVD generated from makeSUSEdvd). I had just assumed that the
old SELS9 directory structure was going to continue to be in use (especially after
it worked for SLES 10 RC2).
Thanks.
Pete
At 09:09 AM 8/3/2006, Uwe Gansert wrote:
Putting all the stuff from the DVD at the 'root' level cleared it up for 32 and 64 bit
(using the DVD generated from makeSUSEdvd). I had just assumed that the
old SELS9 directory structure was going to continue to be in use (especially after
it worked for SLES 10 RC2).
Thanks.
Pete
At 09:09 AM 8/3/2006, Uwe Gansert wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:06, you wrote:
> ls -ls
> total 76
> 4 -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 4075 Aug 1 14:46
> autoinst-sun.xml 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jul 27
> 12:27 boot -> sles10/boot
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jul 27 12:27 content
> -> sles10/content
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jul 27 12:28
> content.asc -> sles10/content.asc
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jul 27 12:28
> content.key -> sles10/content.key
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jul 27 12:28
> control.xml -> sles10/control.xml
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jul 27 12:29 media.1
> -> sles10/media.1
> 4 drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 27 12:28 sles10
> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jul 27 12:29 suse ->
> sles10/suse
why the level above?
Why don't you use the sles10 directory directly instead of linking some
files?
--
ciao, Uwe Gansert
Uwe Gansert, Server Technologies Team
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany
Business: http://www.suse.de/~ug
now playing The Retrosic - Sphere
| < Previous | Next > |