Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-autoinstall (123 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
RE: RE: [suse-autoinstall] Antwort: Re: [suse-autoinstall] sles 9 installation Source in autoyast.xml [Virus checked]
- From: Matthias.Eble@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <OF982E6736.235CA38F-ONC1257052.0046BFEC-C1257052.0047E7B5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<fraser_bailey@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 02.08.2005 10:36:29:
> Here's a script we use. It works through a template and replaces the
> values which it finds with values which the use types in. You will
> obviously need to modify your template of modify this script to
> match the values in your template, but you shoudl get the general idea.
thanks for your script.
now I discovered a strange behaviour again. Perhaps someone can help.
my interfaces section looks like this:
<interfaces config:type="list">
<interface>
<bootproto>static</bootproto>
<broadcast>BCAST-ADDR</broadcast>
<device>eth0</device>
<ipaddr>IP-ADDR</ipaddr>
<netmask>SN-MASK</netmask>
<network>NW-ADDR</network>
<startmode>onboot</startmode>
</interface>
</interfaces>
but the ip seems to be assigned to a random interface (I've seen eth2 and
eth3).
Can this effect be caused by the indention of bcast, ip, netmask and
network, or is it estimated behaviour?
thanks
matthias
> Here's a script we use. It works through a template and replaces the
> values which it finds with values which the use types in. You will
> obviously need to modify your template of modify this script to
> match the values in your template, but you shoudl get the general idea.
thanks for your script.
now I discovered a strange behaviour again. Perhaps someone can help.
my interfaces section looks like this:
<interfaces config:type="list">
<interface>
<bootproto>static</bootproto>
<broadcast>BCAST-ADDR</broadcast>
<device>eth0</device>
<ipaddr>IP-ADDR</ipaddr>
<netmask>SN-MASK</netmask>
<network>NW-ADDR</network>
<startmode>onboot</startmode>
</interface>
</interfaces>
but the ip seems to be assigned to a random interface (I've seen eth2 and
eth3).
Can this effect be caused by the indention of bcast, ip, netmask and
network, or is it estimated behaviour?
thanks
matthias
| < Previous | Next > |